Original Research Articles

Magnetic Nanoparticles in Biomedical Rehabilitation: Emerging Applications in Physiotherapy and Targeted Therapeutics

Elena V. Petrova

Received 13 Jul 2026, Published online: 30 Jun 2026

Published in Volume 6, Issue 1, 2026, pages 9-12

Open access

Abstract

Magnetic nanoparticles have emerged as multifunctional materials for biomedical imaging, targeted drug delivery, controlled therapeutic release, magnetic hyperthermia, cell guidance, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles are particularly important because their magnetic behavior can be remotely controlled while their surfaces can be modified with polymers, antibodies, peptides, growth factors, drugs, nucleic acids, and biomimetic molecules. These characteristics have generated interest in their possible integration with biomedical rehabilitation and physiotherapy, especially for bone healing, peripheral nerve repair, skeletal-muscle regeneration, cartilage restoration, tendon recovery, localized pain management, and the delivery of anti-inflammatory or regenerative agents.

This review examines the physicochemical design of magnetic nanoparticles, their interaction with external magnetic fields, and their emerging roles in rehabilitation-oriented medicine. Magnetic scaffolds may provide mechanical and biochemical cues that support osteogenesis, angiogenesis, axonal growth, myoblast alignment, and stem-cell differentiation. Magnetic targeting may also concentrate therapeutic agents or magnetically labelled cells at injured tissues while reducing systemic exposure. Alternating magnetic fields can produce localized heating for hyperthermia or temperature-triggered drug release, whereas static or low-frequency fields may generate mechanical forces within magnetically responsive biomaterials. Nevertheless, most applications directly related to physiotherapy remain at laboratory or animal-study stages. Established clinical uses of iron-oxide nanoparticles in medicine do not yet demonstrate that magnetic nanoparticle treatments are effective replacements for exercise therapy, manual therapy, electrotherapy, rehabilitation training, or conventional pharmacological management. Translation requires standardized characterization, realistic dosing, long-term toxicity assessment, controlled clinical trials, rehabilitation-specific outcome measures, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Magnetic nanoparticles are therefore best understood as potential adjunctive platforms that may increase the precision and biological responsiveness of future rehabilitation interventions.

Keywords

  • magnetic nanoparticles
  • biomedical rehabilitation
  • physiotherapy
  • targeted drug delivery
  • tissue engineering
  • regenerative medicine
  • magnetic hyperthermia
  • superparamagnetic iron oxide

References

  1. [1] Pankhurst, Q. A., Connolly, J., Jones, S. K., and Dobson, J. “Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles in Biomedicine.” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 36, R167–R181, 2003. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/36/13/201.
  2. [2] Laurent, S., Forge, D., Port, M., Roch, A., Robic, C., Vander Elst, L., and Muller, R. N. “Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Stabilization, Vectorization, Physicochemical Characterizations, and Biological Applications.” Chemical Reviews, 108(6), 2064–2110, 2008. doi:10.1021/cr068445e.
  3. [3] Ulbrich, K., Holá, K., Šubr, V., Bakandritsos, A., Tuček, J., and Zbořil, R. “Targeted Drug Delivery with Polymers and Magnetic Nanoparticles: Covalent and Noncovalent Approaches, Release Control, and Clinical Studies.” Chemical Reviews, 116(9), 5338–5431, 2016. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00589.
  4. [4] Vangijzegem, T., Lecomte, V., Ternad, I., Van Leuven, L., Muller, R. N., Stanicki, D., and Laurent, S. “Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: From Fundamentals to State-of-the-Art Innovative Applications for Cancer Therapy.” Pharmaceutics, 15(1), 236, 2023. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15010236.
  5. [5] Dasari, A., Xue, J., and Deb, S. “Magnetic Nanoparticles in Bone Tissue Engineering.” Nanomaterials, 12(5), 757, 2022. doi:10.3390/nano12050757.
  6. [6] Sadeghzadeh, H., Dianat-Moghadam, H., Del Bakhshayesh, A. R., Mohammadnejad, D., and Mehdipour, A. “A Review on the Effect of Nanocomposite Scaffolds Reinforced with Magnetic Nanoparticles in Osteogenesis and Healing of Bone Injuries.” Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 14, 194, 2023. doi:10.1186/s13287-023-03426-0.
  7. [7] Poggetti, A., Battistini, P., Parchi, P. D., Novelli, M., Raffa, S., Cecchini, M., Nucci, A. M., and Lisanti, M. “How to Direct the Neuronal Growth Process in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: Future Strategies for Nanosurfaces Scaffold and Magnetic Nanoparticles.” Surgical Technology International, 30, 458–461, 2017.
  8. [8] Escobar, A., Reis, R. L., and Oliveira, J. M. “Nanoparticles for Neurotrophic Factor Delivery in Nerve Guidance Conduits for Peripheral Nerve Repair.” Nanomedicine, 17(7), 477–494, 2022. doi:10.2217/nnm-2021-0413.
  9. [9] Rossi, A., Bassi, G., Cunha, C., Baldisserri, C., Ravaglia, N., Gardini, D., et al. “Magnetically Induced Anisotropic Structure in an Injectable Hydrogel for Skeletal Muscle Regeneration.” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 678, 334–345, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2024.09.121.
  10. [10] Meng, J., Xiao, B., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Xue, H., Lei, J., et al. “Super-Paramagnetic Responsive Nanofibrous Scaffolds under Static Magnetic Field Enhance Osteogenesis for Bone Repair in Vivo.” Scientific Reports, 3, 2655, 2013. doi:10.1038/srep02655.
  11. [11] Maier-Hauff, K., Ulrich, F., Nestler, D., Niehoff, H., Wust, P., Thiesen, B., et al. “Efficacy and Safety of Intratumoral Thermotherapy Using Magnetic Iron-Oxide Nanoparticles Combined with External Beam Radiotherapy on Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme.” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 103, 317–324, 2011.
  12. [12] Shirvalilou, S., Khoei, S., Khoee, S., and Raoufi, N. J. “Magnetic Hyperthermia as an Adjuvant Cancer Therapy in Combination with Radiotherapy versus Radiotherapy Alone for Recurrent/Progressive Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2021.
  13. Qazi, M. A., & Sohail, N. (2026). Factors influencing the intention to engage in socially responsible investing. Journal of Economic Innovation and Development, 1(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.65072/jeid.v1i1.3
  14. Mousumi, A., & Sohail, N. (2026). Service quality, engagement, and loyalty in Malaysian telecom. International Journal of Business and Social Science Studies, 6(1). https://ijbsss.com/index.php/IJBSSS/index
  15. Singh, H. S. J., & Sohail, N. (2026). Medical negligence in Malaysian hospitals: A qualitative thematic analysis of organisational and governance failures. Journal of Innovation and Research in Technology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.66857/jirt.v3i2.38
  16. Asad, M. M., & Sohail, N. (2026a). The influence of vlog marketing on consumer purchase decision-making in Malaysia: The mediating role of consumer engagement. Global Media and Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(2).
  17. Asad, M. M., & Sohail, N. (2026b). Vlog marketing and customer decision-making: A review of the mediating roles of customer engagement and brand perception in the Malaysian context. An integrative literature review and conceptual framework. Asian Journal of Research in Business and Management, 3(1).

Metrics

Article views
61
Downloads
56

Licensing

© 2026 Journal of Magnetism and Its Applications. This article is published under CC BY 4.0.

How to cite

Elena V. Petrova , E. V. P. (2026). Magnetic Nanoparticles in Biomedical Rehabilitation: Emerging Applications in Physiotherapy and Targeted Therapeutics. Journal of Magnetism and Its Applications, 6(1), 9-12.

How to Cite

Magnetic Nanoparticles in Biomedical Rehabilitation: Emerging Applications in Physiotherapy and Targeted Therapeutics. (2026). Journal of Magnetism and Its Applications, 6(1), 9-12. https://www.jourmag.org/index.php/jma/article/view/147